User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; MZ601 Build/I.7.1-42) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.57 Safari/537.36 OPR/18.0.1290.67495
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Opera 18.0.1290.67495Android 4.0.4Blink MotorolaMZ601tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.0MotorolaXoomTabletyesyes0.16102 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 18.0.1290.67495closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 18.0.1290.67495closeAndroid 4.0.4MotorolaMZ601mobile-browseryescloseclose0.253 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 18.0Blink Android 4.0MotorolaMZ601tabletyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 18.0.1290.67495closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 18.0.1290closeAndroid 4.0.4MotorolaMZ601closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.087 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 18.0.1290.67495WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 18.0Blink Android 4.0.4MotorolaXOOM 3Gtabletyescloseclose0.036 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 18.0.1290.67495closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 18closeAndroid 4.0MotorolaMZ601Tabletyesyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:00 | by ThaDafinser