User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 7.0) XSpider 7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
XSpider 7 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident WinNT Windows DesktopDesktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closeWindows 7.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.237 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesXSpiderclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows NT 7.0desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:00 | by ThaDafinser