User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/5.16/24.1029; U; en) Presto/2.5.25 480X800 LG VX11000H-U660
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGVX11000H Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.2Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 5.16close LGVN270mobile-browseryescloseclose0.211 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 5.16Presto Brew LGVX11000Hsmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 5.16close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 5.16closeBREW LGVX11000Hcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 5.16close closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 5.16Presto 2.5.25a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 5.16Presto 2.5.25Brew LGEnv Touchmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.1close LGVN270Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:00 | by ThaDafinser