User agent detail

MQBrowser/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 8.4 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Safari iOS 8.4Webkit 536.26AppleiPhonemobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.046 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7534.48.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari closeiOS 8.4AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.207 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 8.4AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 8closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari closeiOS 8.4AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 8.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 536.26iOS 8AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 536.26iOS 8.4AppleiPhonemobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:00 | by ThaDafinser