User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (S60V3; U; Pt-br; NOKIAX5-01.2) AppleWebKit/530.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.6.0.199/28/355/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaX5-01 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.06701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 530.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.6WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 V3NokiaX5-01smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 530.13closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.6.0closeSymbian OS NokiaX5-01closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.096 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.6.0.199WebKit 530.13 NokiaMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.449 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.6Gecko Series60 3NokiaX5-01.2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:59 | by ThaDafinser