User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; U; de) Presto/2.10.229 Version/11.64
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
Opera 11.64Win7 6.12.10 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.64Presto 2.10Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.64closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.64closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.64Presto Windows 7desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.64closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.64closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.64closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.083 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.64Presto 2.10.229Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.484 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 11.64Presto 2.10.229Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.64closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux zvav Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:59 | by ThaDafinser