User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; GT-I8260 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.58 Mobile S
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I8260 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 26.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.21302 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.58closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungGT-I8260mobile-browseryescloseclose0.272 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 26.0WebKit Android 4.1SamsungGALAXY Coresmartphoneyes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.58closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 26.0.1410closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungGT-I8260closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.114 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 26.0.1410.58WebKit 537.31Android 4.1.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 26.0.1410.58Webkit 537.31Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Coremobile:smartyescloseclose0.05901 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 26closeAndroid 4.1SamsungGT-I8260Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.27603 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:59 | by ThaDafinser