User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-us; KFTHWI Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.12 Safari/535.19 Silk-Accelerated=true
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
Silk 3.12Android unknownunknown AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.12WebKit Android AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7Tabletyesyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 535.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.249 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 3.12Blink Android AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7" WiFitabletyes0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.12closeAndroid AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7" WiFicloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.103 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.12WebKit 535.19Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.12Webkit 535.19FireOS 3AmazonKindle Fire HDXtabletyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 3.1closeAndroid AmazonKFTHWITabletyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:58 | by ThaDafinser