User agent detail

Nokia1682c/06.86
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia1682c Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia1682c 06.86closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries40 Nokia1682 classicmobile-browseryescloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia1682csmartphoneyes0.015 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 06.86closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia1682ccloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 1682ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series40 Nokia1682 classicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Nokia1682cFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:58 | by ThaDafinser