User agent detail

mozilla/5.0 (linux; u; android 4.2.2; fr-fr; mfc500fr build/jdq39) applewebkit/534.30 (khtml, like gecko) version/4.0 safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Android Browser Android 4.2.2WebKit LexibookTablet XLtablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
applewebkit 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid FLYIQ4401mobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2LexibookTablet XLtabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeandroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.30 closeclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:58 | by ThaDafinser