User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 5; CPU iPhone OS 6_1_4 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 MQQBrowser/5.0.5 Mobile/10B350 Safari/8536.25
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-ios.yaml
QQ Browser 5.0iOS 6.1.4Webkit 536.26AppleiPhone 5mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.0WebKit iOS 6.1AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.08301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.1.4AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 5.0WebKit iOS 6.1AppleiPhone 5smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.1.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 5.0.5closeiOS 6.1.4closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0closeiPhone OS 6.1.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 5.0.5WebKit 536.26iOS 6.1.4AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.563 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 5.0Webkit 536.26iOS 6.1.4AppleiPhone 5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:58 | by ThaDafinser