User agent detail

curl/7.16.0 (i386-unknown-openbsd4.1) libcurl/7.16.0 OpenSSL/0.9.7j zlib/1.2.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
OpenBSD 4.1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yescURLBot/Crawler0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
curl 7.16.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
cURL 7.16.0closeBSD 4.1software-librarycloseclose0.208 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
curl 7.16 0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
curl 7.16.0closeOpenBSD 4.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
cURL 7.16.0 OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OpenBSD 4.1closeclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:55 | by ThaDafinser