User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux mipsel; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; TOSHIBA; DTV_L7363; 7.1.68.00.01.1; a5; ) ; ToshibaTP/2.0.0 (+DRM+3D) ; xx) AppleWebKit/537.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) TOSHIBA-DTV (DTV_L7363; 7.1.68.00.01.1; 2013A; EU)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/toshiba.yaml
Webkit 537.4ToshibaRegza L7363 Smart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 537.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close media-playercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux ToshibaGLOBAL PLAT3tv0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeTOSHIBA 2013TOSHIBADTV_L7363closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.192 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 537.4Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.438 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.4 ToshibaRegza L7363 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:55 | by ThaDafinser