User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (WindowsCE 6.0; rv:2.0.1) Gecko Firefox/5.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows CE Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 2.0Gecko 2.0 Desktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 5.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 5.0.1closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 5.0Gecko Windows desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 5.0.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 5.0.1closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 5.0.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 5.0.1Gecko Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Mobile 5.0.1Gecko 2.0.1Windows CE mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 5.0.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 5.0closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:54 | by ThaDafinser