User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.3; U; Series60/3.2 SAMSUNG-GT-I8510C/1.0; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I8510C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.3Nokiamobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.2SamsungGT-I8510Csmartphoneyes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2closeSymbian OS 9.3SamsungGT-I8510Ccloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.2closeSymbianOS 9.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 413Symbian Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 413Series60 3.2SamsungGT-I8510Cmobile:smartyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.3SamsungI7110Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:54 | by ThaDafinser