User agent detail

Dalvik/1.6.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; LIFETAB_E10320 Build/JDQ39)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Dalvik 1.6Android 4.2unknown MedionLifeTab E10320Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dalvik 1.6WebKit Android 4.2MedionLifeTab E10320Tabletyesyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Dalvik 1.6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2MedionLifetab E10320mobile-browseryescloseclose0.254 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2MedionLifetab E10320tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2MedionLifetab E10320closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.428 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.2.2MedionLifetab E10320tabletyescloseclose0.043 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2MedionLIFETAB_E10320Tabletyesyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:54 | by ThaDafinser