User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; Series 60/5.0 NokiaC5-04/10.0.022; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) BrowserNG/7.2.3.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaC5-04 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.19202 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 525closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Browser 7.2.3.1closeSeries60 NokiaC5-04mobile-browseryescloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser 7.2WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0NokiaC5-04smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 10.0.022;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.2.3closeSymbian OS 9.4NokiaC5-04closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeSymbianOS 9.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser WebKit 525NokiaOS NokiaNokia C5-04closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.474 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Browser 7.2.3Webkit 525Series60 NokiaC5-04mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SymbianOS closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:54 | by ThaDafinser