User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-US; SP-6020 QUASAR Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/10.1.0.527 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 10.1Android 4.2unknown WooQuasarTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.1U3 Android 4.2WooQuasarTabletyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2SimvalleySP-60mobile-browseryescloseclose0.314 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.1WebKit Android 4.2yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.1.0closeAndroid 4.2.2SimvalleySP-6020 QUASARcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.106 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.1.0.527WebKit 533.1Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.492 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.1Webkit 533.1Android 4.2.2SP-6020 QUASARmobile:smartyescloseclose0.16702 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:53 | by ThaDafinser