User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (LG-T565 AppleWebkit/531 Browser/Phantom/V2.0 Widget/LGMW/3.0 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGT565 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Phantom Browser 2.0WebKit JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebkit 531closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Phantom 2.0close LGT565mobile-browseryescloseclose0.221 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Java LGT565smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Phantom Browser 2.0close LGT565closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 531 LGLGT565closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Phantom 2.0Webkit 531 LGT565mobile:featureyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGLG-T565Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:53 | by ThaDafinser