User agent detail

MQQBrowser/5.0/HS-T96_TD/1.0 Android/4.0 Release/5.10.2012 Browser/AppleWebKit534.30 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
QQ Browser 5.0Android 4.0Webkit 534.30HisenseT96mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MQQBrowser 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 5.0closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.251 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 5.0WebKit Android 4.0HisenseHS-T96smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 5.0closeAndroid 4.0closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 5.0WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 5.0Webkit 534.30Android 4.0HisenseT96mobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:53 | by ThaDafinser