User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_3; en-us; Silk/1.0.22.153_10033210) AppleWebKit/533.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/533.16 Silk-Accelerated=true
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Mobile Silk 1.0.22.153Android Blink 533.16AmazonKindle Firetabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 1.0WebKit Android AmazonKindleEbook Readeryesyes0.11701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 1.0.22.153closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0closeOS X 10.6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 1.0Blink Android AmazonKindle Firetabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeOS X 10.6.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 1.0.22closeAndroid AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0closeOS X 10.6.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 1.0.22.153WebKit 533.16Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 1.0Webkit 533.16FireOS AmazonKindle Firetabletyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 1.0closeAndroid 2.3AmazonD01400Tabletyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:52 | by ThaDafinser