User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Maxthon
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
Maxthon 2.0WinXP 5.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Maxthon 2.0Trident WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Maxthon closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Maxthon Windows XPdesktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Maxthon 0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Maxthon closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Maxthon Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:52 | by ThaDafinser