User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.127 Large Screen Safari/533.4 GoogleTV/ 162671
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/google.yaml
Chrome 5Google TV Webkit 533.4television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 5.0WebKit Linux GoogleGoogleTVTV Device0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 5.0.375.127closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 5.0.375.127closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.306 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 5.0WebKit Google TV GoogleGoogleTVtvyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 5.0.375.127closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 5.0.375closeLinux GoogleTVcloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 5.0.375.127closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 5.0.375.127WebKit 533.4Google TV closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 5Webkit 533.4Google TV televisioncloseclose0.06401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 5.0.375.127closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux i686 GoogleTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:52 | by ThaDafinser