User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; es-LA; samsung-sgh-i617) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.9.0.251 U2/1.0.0 Mobile, SAMSUNG-SGH-I617/1.0 Mozilla/4.0 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsungsgh-i617 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.9U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.9 Samsungsgh-i617smartphoneyes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.9.0close Samsungsgh-i617closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.9.0.251 SamsungMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.9Gecko Windows Mobile Samsungi617 BlackJack IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:52 | by ThaDafinser