User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1pre) Gecko/20090717 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Shiretoko/3.5.1pre
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Ubuntu 9.04 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.5Gecko 1.9.1Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.19402 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (Shiretoko) 3.5.1precloseLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.214 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox Shiretoko (3.5Gecko Ubuntu 9.04desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Shiretoko 3.5.1precloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox (Shiretoko) 3.5.1closeUbuntu 9.4closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Shiretoko 3.5.1precloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Shiretoko 3.5.1preGecko 20090717Linux 9.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Shiretoko 3.5.1Gecko 1.9.1Ubuntu 9.04desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:52 | by ThaDafinser