User agent detail

LGE-LX5350/1.0 UP.Browser/6.1.0.2.135 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGLX5350 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1 LGLX5350Mobile Phoneyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LGE-LX5350 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1.0.2.135close LGLX5350mobile-browseryescloseclose0.204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1 LGLX5350smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.1.0close LGLX5350closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1.0.2.135 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.1 LGLX5350mobile:featureyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGLX5350Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:50 | by ThaDafinser