User agent detail

ERO247 Android Application (15, ero247 v2.2.1) - samsung GT-I9295 samsung - 00000000-6F02-4FD4-8CE8-F5F544518EA1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
samsungGT-I9295 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ERO247 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid SamsungGalaxy S4 Activemobile-browseryescloseclose0.257 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android SamsungGALAXY S4 ACTIVEsmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid samsungGT-I9295closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android SamsungGalaxy S4 Activemobile:smartyescloseclose0.06501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.043 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:50 | by ThaDafinser