User agent detail

MT6572_TD/V1 Linux/3.4.5 Android/4.2.2 Release/03.26.2013 Browser/AppleWebKit534.30 Mobile Safari/534.30 MBBMS/2.2;
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
Android 4.0Android 4.2unknown CubotGT 95 3GMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2CubotGT 95 3GMobile Phoneyesyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeAndroid 4.2.2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.087 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.427 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2MediatekMT6572 based devicedevboardcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 4.2closeAndroid 4.2SymphonyXplorer w72 MT6572/V1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:48 | by ThaDafinser