User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux) KHTML/3.5.10 (like Gecko) SUSE
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-konqueror.yaml
Konqueror 3.5SUSE KHTML 3.5.10desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 3.5KHTML Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 3.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 3.5KHTML SUSE desktop0.015 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 3.5;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 3.5closeSUSE closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 3.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 3.5 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 3.5KHTML 3.5.10SUSE desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:48 | by ThaDafinser