User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; M-MP875S2 Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MediacomM-MP875S2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.06501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.316 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.1MediacomSmartPad 875 S2tabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.1.1MediacomM-MP875S2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.099 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.468 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.1.1MediacomSmartPad 875 S2tabletyescloseclose0.035 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1MediacomMP875S2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.05601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:48 | by ThaDafinser