User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DirectFB; U; Linux i686; en-us) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/531.2+; CNS_UA; LG Browser/4.05; AD_LOGON=4C47452E4E4554; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; LGE; GLOBAL_PLAT3; 1.0; 1.0;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/lg.yaml
LG Browser 4.05 Webkit 531.2LGNetCast TV 2012television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 531.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux LGGLOBAL PLAT3tv0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux LGGLOBAL_PLAT3closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 531.2Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LG Browser 4.05Webkit 531.2 LGNetCast TV 2012televisioncloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:48 | by ThaDafinser