User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.6 Safari/525.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome Beta 0.2.149.6Windows Server 2003Webkit 525.13desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 0.2WebKit WinXP 5.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.12001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 0.2.149.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 0.2.149.6closeWindows 5.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 0.2WebKit Windows Server 2003desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 0.2.149.6closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 0.2.149closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 0.2.149.6closeWindows Server 2003 closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 0.2.149.6WebKit 525.13Windows Windows NT 5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Beta 0.2.149.6Webkit 525.13Windows Server 2003desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 0.2.149.6closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 0.2.149.6closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:47 | by ThaDafinser