User agent detail

Hatena Antenna/0.5 (http://a.hatena.ne.jp/help)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/crawler.yaml
yesHatena Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesHatena AntennaBot/Crawler0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Hatena closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesHatena Antennaclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesHatena Antennaclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesHatenaclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:47 | by ThaDafinser