User agent detail

MQQBrowser/451 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 5SGLOBAL; CPU iPhone OS 7_0_4 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/11B554a Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-ios.yaml
QQ Browser 451iOS 7.0.4Webkit 537.51.1AppleiPhone 5mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QQbrowser WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7534.48.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 451closeiOS 7.0.4SonyEricssonST25imobile-browseryescloseclose0.2 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 451WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPhone 5Ssmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 7.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 451closeiOS 7.0.4closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 7.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.07 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 451WebKit 537.51.1iOS 7.0.4AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 451Webkit 537.51.1iOS 7.0.4AppleiPhone 5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:46 | by ThaDafinser