User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110922 Firefox/7.0 SeaMonkey/2.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-seamonkey.yaml
SeaMonkey 2.4Linux Gecko 7.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SeaMonkey 2.4Gecko Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SeaMonkey 2.4closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.179 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SeaMonkey 2.4Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 2.4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 2.4closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SeaMonkey 2.4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Seamonkey 2.4Gecko 20110922Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.541 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 2.4Gecko 7.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 7.0closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:46 | by ThaDafinser