User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-us; IQ456 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 ACHEETAHI/2100501070
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
CM Browser 0.0Android 4.2unknown FlyERA Life 2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CM Browser WebKit Android 4.2FlyERA Life 2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2FLYIQ 456mobile-browseryescloseclose0.253 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2FlyIQ456closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2FlyIQ456 Era Life 2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 24closeAndroid 4.2FLYIQ 456Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.07901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:45 | by ThaDafinser