User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; TAB 8 3G V8 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.135 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 36.0.1985.135Android 4.1.2Blink TreviTAB 8 3G V8tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 36.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeAndroid 4.1.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.264 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 36.0Blink Android 4.1TreviTAB 8 3G V8tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 36.0.1985closeAndroid 4.1.2TAB 8 3G V8closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.135WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 36Blink Android 4.1.2TreviTab 8 V8tabletyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 36closeAndroid 4.1TreviTAB 8 3G V8Tabletyesyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:45 | by ThaDafinser