User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.3; U; Ser ies60/3.2 NokiaN85-3/1.00 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configurat ion/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Saf ari/413
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaN85-3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.15502 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 NokiaN85mobile-browseryescloseclose0.209 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian OS 9.3NokiaN85smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 1.00closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 85closeSymbian OS 9.3NokiaN85-3closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeSymbianOS 9.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser WebKit 413NokiaOS NokiaNokia N85-3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.419 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 413Series60 NokiaN85mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SymbianOS closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:44 | by ThaDafinser