User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/46.0.2486.0 Safari/537.36 Edge/13.11067 BingPreview/1.0b
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesBing Preview Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Edge 13.0Edge 13.0Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Edge 13.11067closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 46.0.2486.0closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBingBotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Edge 13.11067closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
BingPreview 1.0closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Edge 13.11067closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.136 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Edge 13.11067WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.491 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesBing Previewclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Edge 13.11067closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:44 | by ThaDafinser