User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (webOS/2.1.2; U; xx) AppleWebKit/532.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/1.0 Safari/532.2 P160UNA/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-webos.yaml
webOS 2.1Webkit 532.2HPVeermobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
WebKit/webOS 1.0WebKit webOS 2.1Mobile Phoneyes0.09101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 1.0closewebOS 2.1.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
wOSBrowser 2.1WebKit webOS 2.1HPVeersmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
webOS Browser 2.1.2closewebOS 2.1.2HPVeercloseclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 1.0closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 1.0WebKit 532.2OS/2 Warp closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.419 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 532.2webOS 2.1HPVeermobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 1.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
webOS Browser 2.2closewebOS 2.2HPP160USmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:44 | by ThaDafinser