User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-us; KFTHWI Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.6 Safari/535.19 Silk-Accelerated=true
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7" WiFi Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.6WebKit Android AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7Tabletyesyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 535.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.258 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 3.6Blink Android AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7" WiFitabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.6closeAndroid AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7" WiFicloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.6WebKit 535.19Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.6Webkit 535.19FireOS 3AmazonKindle Fire HDXtabletyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 3.1closeAndroid AmazonKFTHWITabletyesyescloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:43 | by ThaDafinser