User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:22.0) Gecko/ /22.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Firefox 22.0Win7 6.122.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 22.0Gecko 22.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:22.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 7desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 22.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.09 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 22.0Gecko Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 22.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:42 | by ThaDafinser