User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) RockMelt/0.16.91.483 Chrome/16.0.912.77 Safari/535.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
RockMelt 0.16Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
RockMelt 0.16WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.10201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
RockMelt 0.16.91.483closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
RockMelt 0.16WebKit Windows 7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
RockMelt 0.16.91closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
RockMelt 0.16.91.483closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.099 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
RockMelt 0.16.91.483WebKit 535.7Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.427 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
RockMelt 0.16Webkit 535.7Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:42 | by ThaDafinser