User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU iPhone OS 501 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
yesFake SafariBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake SafariBot/Crawler0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS 501AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.205 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 5.1WebKit iOS 501AppleiPadtabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.1closeiOS 501closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS 5.1AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1closeiPhone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari 5.1WebKit 534.46iOS 501AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 534.46iOS 501AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari closeiOS AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:42 | by ThaDafinser