User agent detail

Browser/Opera Opera/9.80 (MTK; U; en-US) Presto/2.5.28 Version/10.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
Opera Mobile 10.10Android unknown2.2 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.2Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.10closeMRE mobile-browseryescloseclose0.247 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.10Presto MTK / Nucleus yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.10close closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.10Presto 2.5.28 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.5.28MRE mobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:42 | by ThaDafinser