User agent detail

Sleipnir/2.9.9
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_lowpriority.yaml
Sleipnir 2.9.9Windows UNKNOWN Ver pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Sleipnir 2.0 Desktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Sleipnir 2.9.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Sleipnir 2.9 0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Sleipnir 2.9.9close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sleipnir 2.9.9 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Sleipnir 2.9.9 closeclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Sleipnir 2.9.9closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:41 | by ThaDafinser