User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SmartHub; SMART-TV; U; Linux/SmartTV+2013; Maple2012) AppleWebKit/535.20+ (KHTML, like Gecko) SmartTV Safari/535.20+ SamsungTV/T-MST14AKUC-0407.0 (Samsung, UN40H6400, Wired)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
Webkit 535.20SamsungUN40H6400 Smart TV 2013television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 535.20closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 535.20closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux SamsungSmart TVtv0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 535.20closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 535.20Smart TV closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 535.20 SamsungUN40H6400 Smart TV 2013televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:41 | by ThaDafinser