User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; Infocrawler; Alexa Toolbar)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Infocrawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.5Trident Win98 98Windows DesktopDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.5closeWindows 98desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesInfocrawlerclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.5Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:40 | by ThaDafinser