User agent detail

SGH-Z107 SHP/VPP/R5 SMB3.1 SMM-MMS/1.1.0 profile/MIDP-2.0 configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
SamsungZ107mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Samsung Mobile Browser SamsungSGH-Z107Mobile Phoneyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SGH-Z107 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close SamsungZ107mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungSGH-Z107smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SamsungZ107mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungSGH-Z107Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:39 | by ThaDafinser