User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 amd64; U; ja) Presto/2.9.168 Version/11.52
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_misc.yaml
Opera 11.52BSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 amd64 pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.52Presto 2.9FreeBSD Desktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.52closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.52closeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.52Presto FreeBSD 8.2desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.52closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.52closeFreeBSD 8.2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.52closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.52Presto 2.9.168FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 11.52Presto 2.9.168FreeBSD 8.2desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.52closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux zvav Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:38 | by ThaDafinser